Source All-Arity Expressive Power Stops Before Fan-Certificate Lift¶
Claim/Theorem¶
Let f_t be the size-2 connected multi-parallel-circuit cut-rank function from [[multiple-parallel-classes-on-one-circuit-give-connected-cut-rank-at-least-three-family.md]], so f_t has arity 2t+1 and t\ge 3.
The currently loaded primary-source expressive-power package does not yet convert the fan-cone obstruction from [[connected-size-2-multi-parallel-family-escapes-modular-plus-fan-cone.md]] into ordinary hidden-vertex nonexpressibility for f_t.
More precisely:
-
Zivny-Cohen-Jeavons prove that every Boolean fan is expressible by binary submodular functions, so fan-cone membership is a sufficient positive construction route in all arities.
-
Their Theorem 16 gives the exact arity-
4equivalence\[ f\in\langle\Gamma_{\mathrm{sub},2}\rangle \iff F_{\mathrm{sep}}\in\operatorname{Mul}(\{f\}) \iff f\in\operatorname{Cone}(\Gamma_{\mathrm{fans},4}). \] -
Their Conjecture 20 proposes the all-arity extension
\[ \Gamma_{\mathrm{sub},k}\cap \langle\Gamma_{\mathrm{sub},2}\rangle = \operatorname{Cone}(\Gamma_{\mathrm{fans},k}) \qquad\text{for all }k, \]but the source records it as a conjecture, not as a theorem.
-
Iwamasa's Boolean network-representability framework confirms that classical Boolean network representability is still exactly
\langle\Gamma_{\mathrm{sub},2}\rangle, and its generalized Boolean network classes add only monotone escape cases. Since nonzero stabilizer cut-rank functions are symmetric and vanish on both\emptysetand the full set, that generalized Boolean framework does not supply a larger positive class or a new all-arity negative invariant here. -
The weighted-polymorphism machinery in Iwamasa is an abstract closure theorem. It does not provide an explicit all-arity weighted-polymorphism basis for Boolean
\Gamma_{\mathrm{sub},2}strong enough to separatef_t.
Applying these source theorems to the present family gives the exact stop point:
f_tsatisfies the direct higher-arityF_{\mathrm{sep}}test by [[two-element-multi-parallel-circuit-family-satisfies-direct-fsep.md]];f_tlies outside the modular-plus-fan cone by [[connected-size-2-multi-parallel-family-escapes-modular-plus-fan-cone.md]];- for the first connected case
t=3, the arity is7, so Theorem 16 does not apply; - the already positive four-ary and mixed pinned-shadow tests do not supply a closure-preserving reduction to the arity-
4theorem.
Therefore the exact missing specialization theorem on the obstruction side is a fan-certificate-to-weighted-polymorphism lift:
Convert the existing fan-cone separating certificate for
f_3into a weighted-polymorphism or multimorphism certificate valid for every function in\langle\Gamma_{\mathrm{sub},2}\rangle, or prove an equivalent family-specific instance of Conjecture 20 for the size-2connected multi-parallel family.
This is a source-grounded obstruction-side closure statement, not a new nonexpressibility theorem.
Dependencies¶
- [[higher-arity-theorem16-would-close-negative-side-on-connected-size-2-family.md]]
- [[connected-size-2-multi-parallel-family-escapes-modular-plus-fan-cone.md]]
- [[two-element-multi-parallel-circuit-family-satisfies-direct-fsep.md]]
- [[boolean-network-generalization-adds-no-nonmonotone-power-for-stabilizer-cut-rank.md]]
- [[every-four-ary-pinning-minor-of-m222-is-one-hidden-representable.md]]
- [[pinned-five-ary-shadows-of-m222-obstruct-one-hidden-realizability.md]]
Conflicts/Gaps¶
- Blocker classification for the Theorem-16 / Conjecture-20 route: (i) the all-arity characterization is conjectural in the source, and (iv) the graph has no theorem converting fan-cone escape into the invariant language of weighted polymorphisms or multimorphisms.
- Iwamasa's stronger non-Boolean or generalized-domain machinery has the wrong hypothesis class for this Boolean stabilizer cut-rank problem unless it first yields an explicit Boolean all-arity separator for
\langle\Gamma_{\mathrm{sub},2}\rangle. - This node does not rule out a beyond-fan-cone hidden-vertex construction. It only says the current source package cannot yet prove such a construction impossible.
Sources¶
10.1016/j.dam.2009.07.00110.1007/s10878-017-0136-y10.48550/arXiv.2109.14599