Higher-Arity Theorem16 Would Close Negative Side On Connected Size-2 Family¶
Claim/Theorem¶
Keep the notation of [[current-expressive-power-package-stops-before-higher-arity-family-obstruction-on-connected-multi-parallel.md]], [[connected-size-2-multi-parallel-family-escapes-modular-plus-fan-cone.md]], and [[two-element-multi-parallel-circuit-family-satisfies-direct-fsep.md]].
After the new family-level fan-cone obstruction, the negative Route-D side now has one exact theorem target rather than a generic “stronger higher-arity obstruction” placeholder.
More precisely:
-
Živný-Cohen-Jeavons prove the arity-
4equivalence\[ f\in \langle \Gamma_{\mathrm{sub},2}\rangle \iff F_{\mathrm{sep}}\in \operatorname{Mul}(\{f\}) \iff f\in \mathrm{Cone}(\Gamma_{\mathrm{fans},4}), \]in Theorem 16.
-
The same paper records the higher-arity refinement conjecture
\[ \Gamma_{\mathrm{sub},k}\cap \langle \Gamma_{\mathrm{sub},2}\rangle = \mathrm{Cone}(\Gamma_{\mathrm{fans},k}) \qquad \text{for all } k, \]as Conjecture 20.
-
By [[two-element-multi-parallel-circuit-family-satisfies-direct-fsep.md]], every size-
2multi-parallel functionf_tsatisfies the direct higher-arityF_{\mathrm{sep}}necessary condition. -
By [[connected-size-2-multi-parallel-family-escapes-modular-plus-fan-cone.md]], every connected member
f_twitht\ge 3lies outside the modular-plus-fan cone.
Therefore any higher-arity extension of Theorem 16 strong enough to characterize \langle \Gamma_{\mathrm{sub},2}\rangle by fan-cone membership on this family would immediately prove nonexpressibility for the entire connected size-2 family.
So the exact expressive-power theorem now missing is not merely “some stronger multimorphism.” It is one of the following equivalent theorem types:
- an all-arity Theorem-16-style characterization of
\langle \Gamma_{\mathrm{sub},2}\rangleon Boolean submodular functions; - Zivný's Conjecture 20 itself, or a family-specific specialization of it;
- a weighted-polymorphism or multimorphism theorem whose force on this family is exactly to upgrade “outside the fan cone” into “outside
\langle \Gamma_{\mathrm{sub},2}\rangle.”
Consequences for the current frontier:
- the negative side is now pinned to one explicit theorem schema already named in the primary source;
F_{\mathrm{sep}}is now concretely known to be too weak on an infinite connected family, not just on isolated witnesses;- any future expressive-power advance should be evaluated against this exact target rather than against a generic higher-arity search.
Dependencies¶
- [[current-expressive-power-package-stops-before-higher-arity-family-obstruction-on-connected-multi-parallel.md]]
- [[two-element-multi-parallel-circuit-family-satisfies-direct-fsep.md]]
- [[connected-size-2-multi-parallel-family-escapes-modular-plus-fan-cone.md]]
Conflicts/Gaps¶
- This node does not prove Conjecture 20 or ordinary-hidden-vertex nonexpressibility for the connected size-
2family. - It identifies the exact higher-arity theorem that would close the negative side if proved.
- A positive hidden-vertex realization beyond the fan cone would still remain compatible with the current source base until such a theorem appears.
Sources¶
10.1016/j.dam.2009.07.00110.1007/s10878-017-0136-y10.48550/arXiv.2109.14599