Tangle Order Equals Branchwidth¶
Claim/Theorem¶
For any matroid \(M\), the maximum order of a tangle in \(M\) is exactly the branchwidth of \(M\).
Equivalently, for a binary linear code \(C\) viewed through its associated binary matroid, code branchwidth can be read as the largest order of a tangle of the connectivity function
\[
\lambda_C(J)=\dim(C|_J)+\dim(C|_{J^c})-\dim(C).
\]
So branchwidth is not just a minimax over tree decompositions. It also has an intrinsic dual description as the order of a coherent family of highly connected sides of low-order separations.
Dependencies¶
- None.
Conflicts/Gaps¶
- This node translates branchwidth into tangle language, but does not itself produce balanced cuts or hardware-aligned cuts.
- The theorem is matroid-theoretic, so applying it to stabilizer spaces still proceeds through the associated binary code or parity-check matroid.
- By itself it does not strengthen the existing
Omega(n/log n)branchwidth bound; it only provides a new way to localize that width.
Sources¶
10.1016/j.jctb.2007.10.008