Small-Side Local Cut Gives Full Local Cross Rank¶
Claim/Theorem¶
Let \(G\) be a full-row-rank binary matrix whose row space is a code \(L\subseteq \mathbf F_2^m\). Partition the coordinates as
\[
[m]=U\sqcup W,
\]
and write
\[
r:=\operatorname{rank}(G)=\dim L.
\]
If
\[
|U|<d(L^\perp)
\qquad\text{and}\qquad
|U|<d(L),
\]
then the intrinsic cross-cut rank of the row space of \(G\) across the cut \(U|W\) is exactly
\[
\chi_U(\operatorname{rowspan}G)=|U|.
\]
More symmetrically, if
\[
\min\{|U|,\ |W|\}<\min\{d(L),d(L^\perp)\},
\]
then
\[
\chi_U(\operatorname{rowspan}G)=\min\{|U|,\ |W|\}.
\]
Proof sketch:
- By [[dual-distance-gives-generator-puncture-rank.md]], the first inequality implies
\[
\operatorname{rank}(G_U)=|U|.
\]
- The second inequality implies that deleting the coordinates in \(U\) does not reduce the row rank: if \(\operatorname{rank}(G_W)<r\), then some nonzero linear combination of the rows of \(G\) vanishes on \(W\), producing a nonzero codeword of \(L\) supported entirely in \(U\), contradicting \(|U|<d(L)\). Hence
\[
\operatorname{rank}(G_W)=r.
\]
- Applying [[cross-cut-stabilizer-rank-rank-formula.md]] to the row space of \(G\) gives
\[
\chi_U(\operatorname{rowspan}G)
=
\operatorname{rank}(G_U)+\operatorname{rank}(G_W)-r
=
|U|+r-r
=
|U|.
\]
Quantum-Tanner corollary for the chosen local-generator blocks:
For each parity-i local block in [[quantum-tanner-theorem17-parity-expander.md]], the local row space is
\[
L_0=C_A\otimes C_B
\qquad\text{or}\qquad
L_1=C_A^\perp\otimes C_B^\perp.
\]
Under the Theorem 17 hypotheses,
\[
d(L_i^\perp)\ge \delta\Delta
\qquad\text{and}\qquad
d(L_i)\ge \delta^2\Delta^2.
\]
Therefore any local partition whose smaller side has size strictly less than \(\delta\Delta\) already has
\[
\chi_{\mathrm{local}}=\text{(smaller-side size)}.
\]
So a lightly crossed root neighborhood is not merely “crossed”; it contributes the maximum possible local intrinsic cut rank.
Dependencies¶
- [[dual-distance-gives-generator-puncture-rank.md]]
- [[cross-cut-stabilizer-rank-rank-formula.md]]
- [[quantum-tanner-theorem17-parity-expander.md]]
Conflicts/Gaps¶
- This theorem is local. The global Quantum Tanner stabilizer space is not a direct sum of root neighborhoods, so one still needs a separate argument to globalize these local contributions without losing too much to overlaps.
- The threshold is controlled by the dual distance of the local row space, which is
\Theta(\Delta)rather than\Theta(\Delta^2). So the theorem only applies to genuinely light local crossings. - The result is again tied to the chosen local-generator presentation, not yet to arbitrary stabilizer bases of the same code.
Sources¶
10.48550/arXiv.2202.1364110.48550/arXiv.0805.2199