Quantum Tanner Incidence Spectral Gap¶
Claim/Theorem¶
Fix one parity \(i\in\{0,1\}\). Let \(I_i\) be the bipartite graph whose left vertices are the square qubits \(Q\) of the left-right Cayley complex and whose right vertices are the complex vertices \(V_i\), with an edge whenever a square is incident to a vertex in \(V_i\). Equivalently, \(I_i\) is the vertex-edge incidence graph of the diagonal graph \(G_i^\square\).
If \(G_i^\square\) is \(\Delta^2\)-regular, then the unsigned incidence matrix \(B_i\) of \(I_i\) satisfies
Hence, if the nontrivial adjacency eigenvalues of \(G_i^\square\) are bounded in absolute value by \(4\Delta\) as in [[quantum-tanner-diagonal-expansion-structure.md]], then the adjacency eigenvalues of \(I_i\) are
In particular, the largest eigenvalue is \(\sqrt{2}\,\Delta\) and every nontrivial eigenvalue has absolute value at most
Therefore the one-parity square-vertex incidence graph underlying the quantum Tanner construction has a constant normalized spectral gap for every fixed sufficiently large \(\Delta\).
Dependencies¶
- [[quantum-tanner-diagonal-expansion-structure.md]]
Conflicts/Gaps¶
- This is a spectral statement about the base incidence graph \(I_i\), not yet a Cheeger-expansion statement for the chosen X- or Z-Tanner graph.
- The node applies to one parity at a time. It does not by itself give expansion of the full Tanner graph containing both X and Z generators.
- Passing from the incidence graph \(I_i\) to the actual stabilizer Tanner graph still requires the local-basis blow-up analysis isolated in [[quantum-tanner-local-generator-blowup.md]].
Sources¶
10.48550/arXiv.2202.13641