Skip to content

Good Codes Have Weakly 4-Connected Log-Branchwidth Minor

Claim/Theorem

Let \(C\) be an [n,k,d] binary linear code. Then the associated binary matroid has a minor \(N\) that is weakly \(4\)-connected and has branchwidth

\[ \operatorname{bw}(N) \;\in\; \Omega\!\left(\frac{k(d-1)}{n\log n}\right). \]

In particular, every asymptotically good code family has a weakly \(4\)-connected minor with branchwidth Omega(n/log n).

Proof sketch:

  1. By [[good-codes-have-logarithmic-branchwidth.md]], the code has branchwidth
\[ \Omega\!\left(\frac{k(d-1)}{n\log n}\right). \]
  1. By [[tangle-order-equals-branchwidth.md]], this gives a tangle of the same order.
  2. By [[large-tangle-yields-weakly-4-connected-minor.md]], that tangle can be concentrated in a weakly \(4\)-connected minor without losing its order.

So the logarithmic intrinsic width of good codes survives after stripping away all low-order decomposition artifacts.

Dependencies

  • [[good-codes-have-logarithmic-branchwidth.md]]
  • [[tangle-order-equals-branchwidth.md]]
  • [[large-tangle-yields-weakly-4-connected-minor.md]]

Conflicts/Gaps

  • This theorem is about a minor of the associated binary matroid, not directly the original code family or the original stabilizer presentation.
  • Weakly \(4\)-connected still does not imply linear balanced-cut rank; it only shows the width survives beyond low-order decomposition.
  • To use this for Conjecture 3, one still needs either:
  • a minor-monotone obstruction relating weakly \(4\)-connected high-branchwidth minors to large hardware-balanced interface state, or
  • a proof that the relevant Quantum Tanner parity-check matroids themselves, not just their minors, inherit stronger connectivity.

Sources

  • 10.48550/arXiv.0805.2199
  • 10.48550/arXiv.0711.1383
  • 10.1016/j.jctb.2007.10.008
  • 10.37236/12467