Direct Sums Of Threshold-Lift Pieces Stay Hidden-Vertex Representable¶
Claim/Theorem¶
Let M_1,\dots,M_t be binary matroids on pairwise disjoint ground sets E_1,\dots,E_t, and assume each M_i lies in the circuit-plus-parallel-class threshold-lift class of [[parallel-extension-of-binary-circuit-gives-threshold-lift-cut-rank.md]]. Let
be their direct sum on E=E_1\sqcup\cdots\sqcup E_t.
Then the connectivity function of M is
for every cut L\subseteq E. Consequently, if H is any full-row-rank binary matrix whose column matroid is M, then
and \chi_L(\mathcal S_H) is ordinarily hidden-vertex graph-cut representable.
More concretely, if E_i is partitioned as P_i\sqcup Q_i with
then the direct sum has cut-rank function
and is realized by the sum of the corresponding four-hidden-bit threshold-lift energies on disjoint hidden-variable sets.
This gives a genuinely broader positive class than the single circuit-plus-parallel-class theorem: a nontrivial direct sum of two such pieces is disconnected and therefore cannot itself be a single circuit-plus-parallel-class matroid.
This is a derived structural theorem.
- By [[cross-cut-stabilizer-rank-rank-formula.md]], stabilizer cut rank equals binary-matroid connectivity, so it is enough to work with
\lambda_M. - For a direct sum of matroids, ranks add:
Hence
- Each
M_iis in the threshold-lift class, so by [[parallel-extension-of-binary-circuit-gives-threshold-lift-cut-rank.md]] and [[parallel-class-affine-basis-family-is-hidden-vertex-graph-cut-representable.md]] there is a binary-submodular realizing energy
with four hidden bits such that
- Summing these energies on disjoint hidden-variable sets gives
Since binary submodularity is preserved under addition, E is again a binary submodular polynomial, and minimizing over all hidden bits yields exactly \lambda_M(L).
5. If at least two summands are nontrivial, then M is disconnected, while every single circuit-plus-parallel-class piece has connected simplification on P_i\cup Q_i. So this is strictly broader than the one-piece structural class.
Consequences for the current frontier:
- the threshold-lift route does extend beyond a single circuit-plus-parallel-class piece;
- the extension currently justified on disk is by direct sums, i.e.
1-sums or disconnected assemblies of threshold-lift components; - this does not yet justify closure under
2-sums or3-sums; - existing nodes [[exact-2-separation-is-2-sum.md]] and [[nonminimal-exact-3-separation-is-3-sum.md]] show that those low-order gluing operations are exactly the constant-connectivity
\chi=1and\chi=2regimes, so by themselves they point toward small separators rather than the large balanced-cut rank needed for compiler-native routing lower bounds.
Dependencies¶
- [[cross-cut-stabilizer-rank-rank-formula.md]]
- [[parallel-extension-of-binary-circuit-gives-threshold-lift-cut-rank.md]]
- [[parallel-class-affine-basis-family-is-hidden-vertex-graph-cut-representable.md]]
- [[exact-2-separation-is-2-sum.md]]
- [[nonminimal-exact-3-separation-is-3-sum.md]]
Conflicts/Gaps¶
- This node proves closure only under direct sums, not under
2-sums,3-sums, or more general matroid gluing operations. - The theorem is derived from rank additivity and the existing explicit threshold-lift gadgets; it is not stated verbatim in the cited papers.
- Direct-sum closure enlarges hidden-vertex representability but does not help the routing frontier by itself, because disconnected or low-order-glued objects remain compatible with small separator structure.
Sources¶
10.48550/arXiv.2109.1459910.1016/j.dam.2009.07.001